It's not sloppy film-making, but rather, a purposeful appropriation of sloppy film-making geared towards appealing to the kind of obsessive movie aficionado who gets the references and can appreciate the joke that Tarantino is attempting to pull. The four broads are not. Sorry, ladies but I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. There's more sex and violence in Bourne than in this! I love obscure B-, C-, and Z-movies in particular - the dumber the plots and the less coherent, the better. If you're not a fan cult cinema or exploitation cinema or indeed a devotee of Tarantino's work then this film really isn't going to impress you. However it turned out to be one of the most boring movies I've seen in my life! I know that when my wife has a bunch of her friends over I have to either leave the house or retreat into my den, otherwise it's like having bamboo shoved under my fingernails.
After another hour of talking - mind you, this time, it's an entirely different deli! And I like Tarantino, but this is not good, not good at all. However, for those who get it, Death Proof has the potential to be a truly exhilarating, one-off piece of film-making. Unfortunately by this time I was so mad at having had to sit through so much mind numbing dialog that I couldn't even enjoy the car chase and what followed. Tarantino is undeniably a pro director, and though I personally think his trademark elements - bizarre dialogue about pop culture, foot fetishism - are somewhat annoying, I was willing to give him a try. Regardless of this, Death Proof is meant as a piece of entertainment. I was a little dubious about seeing this out of context of 'Grindhouse' as i figured, despite what the greedy distributors might think, it would make less sense and the idea as a whole would work better in Europe, particularly after we've been waiting for so long.
Director By: Kurt Russell, ZoÃ« Bell, Rosario Dawson, Vanessa Ferlito Keywords : Death Proof yts movies, Death Proof full movie free download, Death Proof srt, Death Proof yify movie download, Death Proof movie download, Death Proof yts torrent, Death Proof download subtitles, Death Proof yify movies, Death Proof movie subtitle download, Death Proof yify torrent movies. . And unless he runs into someone who is as crazy or drives as well as him, there is no way to stop him. With Death Proof 2007 , Tarantino creates such a loving homage to a notoriously cult cinematic sub-culture that many people seem unaware of how to approach it or even how to appreciate the sheer fact that the film purposely goes out of its way to ape the style of late 60's and early 70's exploitation cinema in look, feel and content. Whenever he arrives in a new town he selects a group of girls and sets his perverse plan into motion. It was meant to be one of the most shamelessly entertaining films of the year. I'm talking about films such as Two-Thousand Maniacs 1964 , Ride the Whirlwind 1965 , Manos: The Hands of Fate 1966 , Satan's Sadists 1968 , The Big Bird Cage 1971 , Boxcar Bertha 1972 , Fight for Your Life 1977 or Satan's Cheerleaders 1977 ; low-budget films made with often-non-professional actors, little in the way of conventional film logic, and highly controversial in terms of plot, theme and content.
With that in mind what made him think him he could pull off a two hour movie with 8 women talking incessantly all the way through it? It all started as an homage to old exploitation cinema and double feature screenings. Far and away the worst scenes in terms of dialogue in Pulp Fiction are those involving women. I really cannot remember a single sentence of note said in this torturous first hour for the protocol, I cannot remember anything said in the second half either , but I am fairly sure that it involved some kind of prank about a lap dance one of them don't ask me for the names pulled on one of the others. Then they get killed by a mysterious guy called Stuntman Mike Kurt Russell. Any film, no matter who is involved in the making of it, that causes you to drift off while you're watching or can't hold your attention is poor. This is all laced with his wet dream on how he thinks women talk when he's not around.
Other reference points are more obvious as they're mentioned explicitly in the film; notably car chase cinema such as Vanishing Point 1971 , Two-Lane Blacktop 1971 , Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry 1974 , Gone in 60 Seconds 1974 and even Spielberg's Duel 1971. After finally gaining the upper hand on Mike and wrecking his car not so death proof now, is it? In Reservoir Dogs one of the only women characters that doesn't get shot was cut from the final film. Fourteen months later, Mike turns up in Lebanon, Tennessee and chase Abernathy, ZoÃ« and Kim, but these girls are tough and decide to pay-back the attack. Am I the only one that thinks Quentin Tarantino's 'Death Proof' is a piece of junk? Pure, unadulterated fun and excitement: that's the key to appreciating Death Proof. When Stuntman Mike does finally appear it's good but too brief, in fact it's a cameo role. If the movie had kicked into overdrive as i expected after that point i could have perhaps forgiven the poor exposition.
The Uma Thurman scenes with Travolta are ham fisted attempts at fantasy chemistry, how a teenager might practise talking to a high school crush in front of a mirror. He's just there for the sheer fun, like everyone else. Avoid it at all costs. It's not funny, not even unintentionally so. Buy the soudtrack, put that on and listen to your girlfriend chat with her friends on speaker phone, at least the conversation will be more realistic.
Do audiences actual expect this film to keep them enthralled and entertained when the vast majority of them would balk at experiencing many of the low-budget, semi-obscure films that influenced it? Some have complained that the film fails on account of its lack of action and emphasis on dialog and technique, but this seems churlish when you think of the films being referenced; with Vanishing Point featuring a number of cryptic, desert-set sequences in which characters talk and talk and talk, while Two-Lane Blacktop punctuates its scenes of hard driving and drag-racing with much in the way of meandering small-talk. This is also the explanation for the purposeful mistakes in continuity, the sloppy editing and the switch between colour and black and white, as well as the facade of severely deteriorating film stock. But, without wanting to sound like a sadist, if it is supposed to be exploitation then where was it? It was, in a word: bizarre. This movie is supposed to be a spoof on the 70's B-grade camp movies. It's an insufferably boring and egomaniacal mess and there is absolutely no reason to see it. It's not interesting, not over-the top surreal, nothing.
What they are talking about, I have no idea. Then cut to few months later where another group of women chatting of the type that makes most men's eyes roll up into their skulls. I'm serious, the first hour of this movie it might have been less but it certainly didn't feel like less consists of absolutely nothing else but four women, whose admittedly good looks cannot mask the fact that they are about as intriguing to watch as display dummies and slightly less entertaining, drinking in a bar and talking. Stuntman Mike is a serial killer using his car as a weapon. Sure, it can be seen as self-indulgent, but surely those of us familiar with the style of film-making being referenced here will revel in this particular kind of extravagance, loving everything from the continually inane female banter to the awesome scenes of high speed carnage. . Death Proof attempts to do something similar with the likes of the American revisionist road movie, the B-cinema of Roger Corman and the femsploitation subgenre of films like The Big Bird Cage 1972 , Caged Heat 1975 , Day of the Woman 1978 and Ms.
However, this does not mean Tarantino has set his visual or verbal obsessions aside: the dialogue is as imaginative and surreal as it has always been, and there are enough shots of bare female feet to keep fans happy. Some films are made for a niche audience, destined to be a cult in their own right. No payoff could have been big enough for having been subjected to about a full hour of excruciating boredom except for maybe, the credits to roll. Don't tell me i don't get it. When I first heard of Death Proof, I was therefore understandably excited. This time, he delivers a straightforward genre movie, albeit with his trademark tough women at the center. I know he's made a career out of this but in previous films most of the dialogue was in short snappy burst with outside views on mass pop culture and it was charmingly woven into strong individual characters that moved the plot and story along.
Another 5 minutes of car chase action. I get the retribution, i get the elongated build up, i get the missing and throw away characters, i get the metaphoric idea of women screwing Stuntman Mike with a car, i get and liked the abrupt ending etc etc. With this in mind, it seems hard to understand what people are complaining about. I love movies in general. This is evident in the amusing switch in title; with the film opening with the caption 'Quentin Tarantino's Thunderbolt', before awkwardly cutting to an obviously out of place title card with 'Death Proof' crudely emblazoned across the screen. Even at the 'Grindhouse' 90 minute mark it would still have been 10 minutes too long and it's a shame it's been taken out of it's context and elongated to it's detriment. The fact that there is film running through the camera is proof enough that something is happening, with the hilariously bland dialog deconstructing the film in much the same way as the purposely amateurish composition, editing and sound all intended to fracture the cinematic language in the same way that Godard did; by reminding the audience that this is the film and the point of the film is to experience the sights and sounds that unfold before us.